REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.

Author: Kakasa Voodooran
Country: Lesotho
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 18 October 2014
Pages: 50
PDF File Size: 12.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.7 Mb
ISBN: 771-7-26238-700-8
Downloads: 33703
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygojind

It can be positive, negative or both. The process gives you the chance to suggest areas you would like to see adapted or removed and even add new elements that would benefit users in the front line. The revision for the ISO standard is to be finalized in The intention is to promote harmonization within ISO documents with respect to risk draaft its management. The changes in the revision only concern the notes to the definitions.

Internet of Things What does it mean?

From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic dealt with separately through a New Work item proposal to address risk management maturity. We can expect that the new version of ISO will be published at the end of or early in In the committee commenting stages there was a strong desire to address the proliferation of terms, that could impair the ease of access to the standard or add to confusion across sectors for many users.

There was also support for more detailed and precise guidance though this ran the risk of adding to both the length and complexity of the standard.

ISO Risk Management Standard Draft available for comment.

For more information go to riskmanagement. A common theme found in the comments was the addition of concepts or examples specific to countries or industries. The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. This view was formed at the Moscow meeting and stuck to while resolving the comments on the technical committee draft reviewed in Jordan. Before being sent to ISO the draft of the DIS was endorsed by the working group WG2 and reviewed by an editorial team who checked for typographic issues and consistency across the different sections.


Please do review and pass on your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below. The Commenting process provides a real opportunity for those with risk responsibilities to feedback to the committee on any issues or opportunities to improve the standard before it becomes a National and International standard.

However, more complex language has been edited and reduced and accordingly the revised text is shorter and more precise and hopefully the user will find it much simpler to read. The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept.

The next ISO meeting is being held in San Francisco in July and this suggests publication of the revised risk management standard perhaps early is The most recent meeting in Jordan provided the impetus and key changes necessary to move the standard forward and out of its committee stages making it available for wider comment.

The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: The problem I have with this sentence is the parts between brackets. The next steps of the revision process are translation into French followed by comments and ballots from the National Standardization Bodies.

The message TC would like to pass on to the reader of the DIS is to critically assess if the current draft provides the required guidance while still remaining relevant to all organizations, kso all countries.

The result was that it was agreed that there was a need to reduce the text quite a lot but that an appropriate balance between giving guidance with enough details and not turning the guidance offered into a school text book. This is a new section in the standard.

The overall message of ISO stays the same that the risk management process is an integrated part of strategic and operational management. Hosting services provided by: The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued.


Ultimately the decision was made to simplify the text and use other documents, such as ISO Guide 73 to provide additional information to those that need it. Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time.

Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2

It is important to keep in mind that we are not drafting an American or European standard, a public sector or financial services standard, but rather 3004 generic international standard.

As this sentence was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way. Climate adaptation measures and our BCM approach drxft a user perspective. The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO Articles Recognising threat – the importance of pre-incident surveillance. In a series of articles we want to present and discuss the major changes that are to be expected.

Revision of ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines – Draft available

It can be positive sometimes expressed as opportunitiesnegative sometimes expressed as threats or both. There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role of standards. The title has slightly changed as well: The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.

More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e. The strengthened generic nature of the standard can hopefully provide for confidence between experts and end users who each have specific problems in ieo but need to understand and communicate with others stakeholders.

Don’t be the weak link.